4 pages in length. The consequences of linking the field too closely to centers of power and policy have long been a significant irritation in an otherwise democratic society wholly capable of self-governing. According to C. Wright Mills, who stated with complete absence of intimidation that social science has quite widely become the way in which overt means of power seek to control the individual, argues how such manipulative maneuvers serve to remove any semblance of moral and political autonomy one may have (Mills, 2000). This assertion bears tremendous merit by virtue of its preoccupation with inevitable loss of democratic tendencies inherent to freedom and rationality. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Name of Research Paper File: LM1_TLCCWrMills.rtf
Buy This Research Paper »
Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
capable of self-governing. According to C. Wright Mills, who stated with complete absence of intimidation that social science has quite widely become the way in which overt means of
power seek to control the individual, argues how such manipulative maneuvers serve to remove any semblance of moral and political autonomy one may have (Mills, 2000). This assertion bears
tremendous merit by virtue of its preoccupation with inevitable loss of democratic tendencies inherent to freedom and rationality. The conflict theory supports Mills
(2004) stance due to its assertion that law exists for no other reason than to control and manipulate the masses, with the ruling class employ the entire legal structure for
their own benefit. "The idea that this society is a balance of powers requires us to assume that the units in balance are of more or less equal power
and that they are truly independent of one another" (Mills, 2004, p. 247). Moreover, Mills (2004) implies how the implementation of law upon an otherwise homogenous society has created
conflict where it once did not exist, with certain populations having historically been in control of political, economic and military decisions, and leaving the vast majority to follow in the
powerful minoritys lead. The concept of a rational society, one in which the entire community is greatly influenced by principles its members completely
and accept without challenge, has indeed proven to be one of the most powerful standards of contemporary culture. It is important to realize that even though this may appear
to be a beneficial concept, it has been met with great hostility by individuals who are unable to follow appropriate paths of self-awareness and wholeness because they are forever under
Back to Research Paper Results