Research Paper on:
Case Study: Lakeside Memorial Hospital : 5 pages in length.

Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
this paper properly! I. IS IT FAIR FOR THE DIALYSIS CENTER TO SUFFER? In the ongoing quest for better health care at lower costs, the Dialysis Center has found  itself the unwitting victim of expansion. Unquestionably, there is little equity with regard to the Centers compromised situation; however, if health care is to improve for the Outpatient Clinic  - which comprises the vast majority of space and patients - there may be nothing Jan can do to save her Dialysis Center from losing out on annual bonuses.  From a profitability standpoint, the Center does not have the ability to compete with the Clinic, inasmuch as the inclination is toward maintaining the Outpatient Clinic over and above the  Dialysis Center. Occasionally hospitals tend to focus more on running smooth production rather than customer needs. By skewing the focus in this  particular fashion, health care organizations such as Lakeside Memorial are not meeting the most satisfactory needs of their patients. Inasmuch as management appears to be more product-oriented than patient-oriented,  it is openly telling the customer that they will determine what is best for their needs. II. SHOULD THE CENTER BE CHARGED ACTUAL COSTS? Indeed, the fees associated with  the Centers move are nowhere in line with the fractional increase imposed upon the Clinic. The fact that the Outpatient Clinic is only paying a meager twenty-five percent more  for an additional one hundred thousand square feet clearly identifies the conflict between the two health providers. While moving the Dialysis Center may prove beneficial in the long run,  the immediate future would significantly impact its ability to turn a profit, not to mention qualify for annual bonuses, as well. III. IS THE $400,000 ALLOCATION CORRECT? It appears