Research Paper on:
Election Outcomes and Political Party Importance

Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
this point of view as something matter of fact, it is quite a dangerous concept. It means that people are not elected on merit, but rather based upon the party  to which they are attached. Of course, ideology is important and there is no dispute that having a system as exists in the United States is desirable. However, when there  are deals made for funding, and candidates are created by the party instead of running on their own ideas, then something is seriously wrong. When children grow up in the  United States of America, they are told that they can be anything. They soon learn that this is really not the case and unless they have a ticket to Harvard  by virtue of their brains, family history or money, they do not stand a chance at becoming president or anyone powerful in the administration. Many children with a great deal  of intelligence really do not have such a chance. Presidents are groomed from the early stages in both parties and each party is always on the lookout for someone with  promise. What does that mean exactly? What happens is that parties do not necessarily look for the best man for the job, but rather for the candidate who is most  electable. For presidential candidates, the election campaign begins a long time before the national vote and much of the events begin in the February prior to the election ("The  race," 1996). That is the time when states begin to hold their first of 50 primaries, and people who are registered members of the two main parties are  able to vote in such primaries (1996). The strategy for presidential candidates is to acquire as many of their supporters as feasible and these primaries go on until June (1996).