Research Paper on:
Frank Smith's Writing and the Writer

Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
that most people argue that a specific form be followed, in terms of grammar, punctuation, and other elements, if writing is to be adequate or above adequate. In Frank Smiths  book, "Writing and the Writer," he argues that such elements work very well in writing as long as the writer does not actively think about the different components. In essence,  if we have to remind ourselves of placement with each and every word, then the use of such elements does not work adequately. In the following paper we examine Smiths  argument, and then provide information which helps to illustrate whether Smiths perspectives would prove valid in practice. Frank Smith One of the most important aspects discussed in Smiths  book is that which involves the act of writing and editing. Smith states that, "Composition and transcription must be separated, and transcription must come last. It is asking too much  of anyone, and especially of students trying to improve all aspects of their writing ability, to expect that they can concern themselves with polished transcription at the same time that  they are trying to compose" (24). He continues, stating that "The effort to concentrate on spelling, handwriting, and punctuation at the same time that one is struggling with ideas and  their expression not only interferes with composition but creates the least favorable situation in which to develop transcription skills as well" (Smith 24). This is perhaps one of the  most essential arguments in Smiths book and one that involves what he deems as the writing process involving the tension between the author and the secretary. Smith illustrates that it  is the author who thinks about the messages, the themes, the ideas, and the language. The secretary part of the individual is concerned with all the mechanical aspects of the