In five pages these 2 stories are contrasted and compared in terms of gender roles and the shared theme of theme of rebellion vs. conformity. There are no other sources listed.
Name of Research Paper File: LM1_TLCLtry.rtf
Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
way just because it is expected of them. In The Lottery, author Shirley Jackson illustrates how a small village, set deep within the constraints of tradition, lose sight of
what is humane and just. Because an annual lottery has been held since the very first folks established the village decades ago, its tradition must be carried on even
though the outcome of this particular contest is something each villager secretly wishes not to receive. Conforming to the yearly routine, every family and its members gather together without
questioning procedure, all the while hoping that the time will pass quickly and the annual tradition will once again be behind them. Jacksons implication of conformity is extraordinarily transparent
as the story draws to a close, in that the outdated lottery is allowed to continue without a single vote of opposition from the crowd - that is, until the
losing number is drawn and Mrs. Hutchinson begs for her life. As though they were nothing more than programmable robots, the entire village sets forth to stone the lottery
"winner" without giving any thought to why, a significant observation on Jacksons part that equates to the way things truly do exist throughout contemporary society. "People began to look
around to see the Hutchinsons. Bill Hutchinson was standing quiet, staring down at the paper in his hand. Suddenly, Tessie Hutchinson shouted to Mr. Summers. You didnt
give him time enough to take any paper he wanted. I saw you. It wasnt fair!" By contrast, Susan Glaspells A Jury of Her Peers illustrates how
justice is both blind and bias when it comes to uncovering the truth. That Mrs. Hale and the sheriffs wife become the saving grace of Minnie Wrights secret speaks