Research Paper on:
Gerry Spence's Justice for None

Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
client with more money, or other just as unjust reasons for the courts to be prejudiced. Philosopher John Rawls contention of justice states that if a particular institution imparts its  own definition of equity that does not equate with the masses, then that institution must either be abolished or reformed. Indeed, the authors egalitarian argument is based upon the  fact that justice, in and of itself, is the sole factor that supports social institutions; however, the concept of justice must be the same across the board in order for  it to be properly implemented. But do we as Americans believe that sacrificing true justice for any other social aspect is not worthy of the transformation? As well,  it is the responsibility of every individual to establish a concrete interpretation of what justice represents, inasmuch as this will warrant a common denominator between and among all populations.  STEREOTYPES AND RACISM Society has been struggling to overcome centuries of racism, racial conflicts and racial polarization. There is virtually no segment of society that is not  affected by racial stereotypes. From school children to the workplace, from the entertainment industry to the sports world, white privilege is an integral part of societys framework - and  nowhere is this more evident than within the justice system. Indeed, a perfect society would reflect an attitude of equality -- rather than one of segregation --  toward the myriad ethnicitys that exist. Gerry Spence points out rampant inequalities that exist within our justice system, unfairness that even he himself has used from time to time.  Indeed, Spence points out that one can readily see through recent events that it has been nearly impossible for the justice system to escape racial stereotypes. From