This paper discusses how hospice care is not being properly utilized in this literature review consisting of six pages. Twenty sources are cited in the bibliography.
Name of Research Paper File: RT13_SA212hsp.rtf
Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
literature merely touches on the dilemma and is rather neutral, while others are critical of the situation. First, it is important to define hospice palliative care; such care is essentially
treatment that has the goal of reliving suffering and improving the quality of life for people who are dying ("Hospice," 2001). While this is the case, it often means
but not necessarily, that the patient is at the last days of his life and desires no interventions to avoid death. Beresford & Kubler-Ross (1993) provide an extensive overview of
the hospice in the death and dying process. Authors provide insights into the hospice situation and also seem to allude to the fact that hospice care is underutilized. This work
is a comprehensive volume and adds credibility to the body of literature on hospice care. Asch-Goodkin, Caloras, Coloney, Kangas & Wegryn (2000) suggest that most dying
patients as well as their families want the benefits of hospice care, but 9 out of 10 adults would prefer to be home instead (2000). In any
event, while sometimes hospice care is rejected in favor of home care, most Americans are not familiar with what a hospice care facility is (2000). Most also are not
aware that Medicare pays for hospice facilities (2000). This article is important in pointing out that the reason for underutilization just might be that people are unaware of the hospice
care concept. A 2000 FDCH Government Account Report suggests that hospice benefits to the Medicare program are important and that it is important for all involved parties to understand
such monetary benefits ("Medicare," 2000). Also, HCFA does not believe that the under utilization concerns that have been voiced by hospice advocates should be discounted (2000). This