Research Paper on:
National Defense, Peacekeeping, and the Military of the United States

Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
in events like the bombing of Pearl Harbor, the September 11, 2001 destruction of the World Trade Center, and even the American Revolution and world peacekeeping missions that we engaged  in the Persian Gulf War and Kosovo. Contends that it is the responsibility of the U.S., however, to continue to act as a world peace keeper. Bibliography lists  5 sources. PPusRole.rtf U.S. Military Peacekeeping Verses National Defense by - 25 Oct 2001 -- for more  information on using this paper properly! Only  casual observation can reveal that there are distinct differences between the traditional U.S. military role of national defense and that of international peacekeeping. While national defense is an inherent  expectation for any military, it seems that peacekeeping missions only fall to the strongest of the worlds powers. There are a number of implications of the U.S. military engaging  in peacekeeping activities abroad, however. These implications call for clearly identifiable responsibilities and limitations, responsibilities and limitations which have obviously played an important historical role in protecting U.S. interest  both at home and abroad and will inevitably do so in our future as well. Our military role in regard to national defense  and peacekeeping alike relates directly to our power as a nation. Power in the United States consists of numerous varied aspects. In most cases when one considers the  concept of power they do so in relation to military might and political influence. There are other aspects of power as well, however. Some contend that the U.S.