Research Paper on:
Novelists Will Never Be Replaced By Artificial Intelligence

Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
do not experience things. They simply put pieces of knowledge given to them in logical order. This point of view is presented by Selmer Bringsjord and David A.  Ferrucci who make the same claim in "Artificial Intelligence and Literary Creativity : Inside the Mind of Brutus, a Storytelling Machine." A student writing on this subject will want to  point out why computers can never write books. Authors claim that computers can never write literature because all they do is subscribe to  a formula (Bringsjord & Ferrucci, 1999). Indeed, they do not have experiences and so they cannot utilize creativity. All they can do is organize things and that will not only  not always make sense, but life is not always orderly or logical. Can a computer write a surprise ending? Of course, but the ending will be formulaic. Computers cannot really  be creative. While authors do a good job in supporting the point of view, a student writing on this subject will want to provide some background. What is artificial intelligence  and when did the debate about its possibilities begin? while the debates go on, in the realm of artificial intelligence, there are two  primary theorists whose works should be explored in honing in on the major debates about AI. Both Turing and Searle have been theorists instrumental in determining the arguments on either  side. Turing claims that it is possible for a machine to think where Searle argues against that supposition. It all started in 1950 when British mathematician Alan Turing wrote  a paper in the journal called Mind that argued that even asking whether or not a computer could think would be a meaningless endeavor, but went on to propose an