Research Paper on:
Nurture or Nature as Aggression Influences

Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
there exists an inherent difference in the aggressive tendencies of males and females. This difference is primarily due to the fact that male chemistry is comprised of considerably more  testosterone, the single-most influential component of aggressive behavior in puberty. The composition of the female body, while similar in appearance, is quite different in strength, vigor and overall endurance,  not to mention the level of testosterone hormone flow through her person. This is not to assert the fact, however, that girls are not capable of attaining substantial strength,  endurance and a sense of aggression during puberty, however, the significantly higher presence of male testosterone is what greatly establishes the difference between the genders. "Testosterone exerts powerful effects  on human bodies, helping make them stronger and bigger. It also increases sex drive and function in men (and, according to some studies, in women ? although this possibility  is still uncertain)" (Flieger PG). It is the age-old nature versus nurture manner of thinking; girls are, by nature, less aggressive than boys because they do not have near the  same level of testosterone -- the hormone responsible for male aggressiveness. As such, Zimbardo et al might readily agree that aggressive tendencies do not come as naturally to girls  as they do to boys. Consequently, physiological and emotional elements must accommodate the differing needs of each gender. Not all girls respond well to the nurturing attitude, just  as not all boys can handle the in-your-face style customarily related their gender, which speaks directly to the notion that in some cases, females can have testosterone levels and, thus,  higher aggressive tendencies. "It seems likely that testosterone and social experience interact with each other. Although social control is usually thought of as a force that represses the