In six pages this paper assesses the pros and cons of an on duty soldier visiting the country of Kuwait. Six sources are cited in the bibliography.
Name of Research Paper File: LM1_TLCKuwat.rtf
Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
level of political upheaval that currently exists across the globe makes any beneficial stay a difficult one to achieve. Granted, one of the primary pluses for being in Kuwait
is to represent the United States of America, one of the most prestigious honors any soldier can have; however, at the same time, the inherent dangers that exist while on
duty in Kuwait often overshadow any honor inherently associated with such a perilous appointment. A strong and influential nation as America does not
have to prove its authority unless and until there is a good reason. However, national policies sometimes dictate the fact that conflict is the only manner in which to
prove a point in an otherwise stubborn situation. Presence in Kuwait is a good example of this, inasmuch as it continues to involve many other entities in the ongoing
quest for global peace. The extent to which current-day political situations of having soldiers in Kuwait today hearkens back to the memory of Desert Storm is both grand and
far-reaching; to ignore the myriad lessons learned for enforced disarmament from the post-Desert Storm experience in Iraq is to be led blindly yet once again into a fatal web with
a fearless, inhumane entity whose only objective is annihilation. The most important of many lessons to be learned for enforced disarmament from the post-Desert Storm experience in Iraq is
that words are cheap. Stipulations of a peace agreement as a direct result of Desert Storm mandated Iraq to comply with specific requirements; when this did not happen as
anticipated, it set a precedence with the manner by which Iraq has continued to dodge disarmament compliance. In much the same way, the opportunity to defend against the threat