In eight pages this position paper opposes gun control and supports the argument that citizens who obey the law should have guns to protect themselves. Ten sources are cited in the bibliography.
Name of Research Paper File: LM1_TLCguncn.rtf
Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
are opposed to removing them from the law abiding citizen, who often needs a gun to protect himself from the very criminal element of society who will always have access
to firearms. Tamper with an Americans constitutional rights, and you tamper with the very foundation upon which this country was built. Charleton
Heston, president of the National Rifle Association (NRA), who contends that "I dont do nice" (Williams, 1998, p. 10) when it comes to the issue of gun control, speaks for
all level-headed, responsible American citizens when he argues that guns are not the cause of crimes involving firearms; rather, what should be addressed is the motivation that ultimately drives people
to commit the crime in the first place. Antigun control activists, however, contend that "social issues are the source of many group conflicts" (Stein, 1995, p. 31), which has
nothing whatsoever to do with limiting the use and private ownership of handguns. We gun owners are appalled by the idea that the
government is trying to come between us and our Second Amendment rights. It is not our fault that a portion of society is so irresponsible as to use firearms
in violent assaults, being that there is no such connection with the average Americans ability to properly handle and discharge a gun. By casting such a wide brush across
the canvas of all firearm owners, it once again puts forth the policy that everyone has to pay for the actions of a relative few. "Most Americans are against
taking away the rights of individuals to own a gun. But what theyre increasingly demanding is rational control over guns" (Gibbs, 1993, p. 18).