Research Paper on:
Pro Choice Defense Argument

Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
viability and the idea of "preservation of life". The weaknesses in the pro-life arguments are considered one of the many inconsistencies which exist within society today in regards to the  abortion debate. Advocates of pro-choice in regards to abortion have found that womens decisions to have abortions are actually based on their basic human right to choose what happens to  them and their bodies, obviously, but also in their basic rights to health, their responsibilities toward their unborn child and their families, the medical communities ethical responsibility to preserving the  health of women, and their right to life considered above that of their unborn children. While many people in society believe that abortion  is immoral and should be stopped, that fact that millions of abortions each year are still conducted on a global basis proves that something else is happening rather than the  assumption that women are becoming morally irresponsible. In many communities around the world there are qualified doctors, nurses, and midwives who are able to perform safe abortions, yet many women  seeking abortions for unwanted pregnancies feel that they are being treated as criminals by those who oppose abortion. The reasons why many legal and moral arguments still exist regarding the  abortion debate is that many of the original laws and ideas formed about abortion originated in colonial times during a different age (Berer, 1993). Many women who seek to have  abortions around the world are forced to use clinics which are unsafe and not monitored. Because of this, there are a great many unnecessary deaths of women due to poor  abortions and clinic conditions. This strikes researchers who have studied the deaths of women as a result of botched abortions as irresponsible in regards to the health of women. In