Research Paper on:
Self, Legitimacy, and Democracy in Habermas and Connolly

Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
concepts, which were but a seed when established in the United States over two hundred years ago, allowed for people to make their own destinies - to follow whatever dreams  they may have kept harbored deep inside for fear that they would never be able to make them a reality. Acceptance of democracy, legitimacy and the self unleashed a  joining together of the people so that new economic and political ideas could be shared in a way they had never been before. Democracy truly had the ability to empower  both the people and the government back in the seventeen hundreds, because at that time they were one and the same entity under the democratic process. The people no  longer felt suppressed and unimportant in matters that affected their very lives, and the government welcomed the variegated input received on every political issue. Democracy was a well-oiled machine  that prospered for all parties involved. How well did William E. Connollys Why I Am Not a Secularist and Jurgen Habermas The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political  Theory join together in the overall assessment of democracy, legitimacy and the self? One only needs to glimpse at these two works in order to ascertain each individuals interpretation.  I. HABERMAS The social, political, economical and religious activities experienced in everyday life represent the very essence of what it means to  be a human being. These representations illustrate how and why a person acts the way he or she does, how they attribute their moods, feelings and emotions, the way  in which they interact with one another, as well as what governs their overall behavior. One can readily argue the fact that democracy, legitimacy and the self are all