In seven pages this paper discusses how sex crimes are treated by the media regarding possible ethnic and racial biases. Ten sources are cited in the bibliography.
Name of Research Paper File: LM1_TLCCrmMd.rtf
Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
subject to scrutiny and accusation under the media eye, it becomes quite apparent how one-sided this treatment is regarding sex crimes. "Perhaps nowhere is the view of minorities and
women more partial and inadequate than in the mass media" (Murphy, 1998, p. 165). One of the most damning aspects of racial stereotypes
as it relates to mass media and sex crimes is the manner in which all members of a particular race become grouped together for the actions of a relative few
(Raspberry, 1995). By casting the negative light of racial profiling toward being Black, Mexican, Asian or any number of other ethnic races, it shows a great deal of ignorance
and disrespect for that individual; just because someone is a member of a certain race does not mean that they represent any of the negative connotations associated with that race.
African-Americans and Latinos are victims of this sort of prejudice on a regular basis by being regularly interrogated by law enforcement. It can readily be argued that the
police are decidedly more prejudice toward some races than they are toward others; for this reason, certain races are badgered with no other justification than because of their color.
However, law enforcement officials are not the only ones who misconstrue reality and perpetuate racial discord, inasmuch as the media have long incited controversy by participating in racial profiling (Gissler,
1998). The impact of such influence, as one would expect, is highly damaging to those at the receiving end of what is known as media agenda setting.
Words carry with them a great deal of power; they are capable of destroying nations and rebuilding faith. They are eloquent and strong, intimidating