A 5 page essay that critically analyzes the meaning of Shakespeare's Sonnet 94. The writer argues that this enigmatic and uncharacteristically chilly sonnet is a criticism of the aristocratic class and how they use their power. Bibliography lists 7 sources.
Name of Research Paper File: D0_khwill94.rtf
Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
love and beauty, Sonnet 94 is uncharacteristically chilly, and offers a memorable metaphor of "festering lilies," which represent the poets "disillusionment of love and ambition" (Pacheco B03). Sonnet 94
has been interpreted a number of ways by countless scholars. Michael Schoenfeldt, for example, examines the poem "in terms of humoral and Galenic theory," while noting "some analogous rocks of
stability in the Bible" (Prescott 49).. Still another critic characterizes the poem as working through "a tone not of infatuation but of social reproof and moral authority," which relates
to the power of the aristocrat to act in a manner that he pleases, or to chose not to act, which contrasts against the fact that such freedom is not
an option to the lower class (Oxquarry Books). The following examination of Sonnet 94 looks at the poem from this perspective, seeing it as a condemnation of certain aristocrats who
stand aloof from society and, in so doing, prove themselves to be as useless as the lilies that fester in the summer sun. According to Peters, critics often fail
to appreciate that Shakespeares comprehension was predicated on "a natural dynamic derived from the natural processes of life" (Peters). As this suggests, Shakespeare finds logic demonstrated in nature and
it is this source on which he draws for determining right and wrong (Peters). According to Peters, Shakespeare defines the ability to discern between right and wrong as a
matter of judgement predicated on the conditions for existence inherent in nature. The viewpoint that this natural perspective generates enables the poet to correct inconsistencies that occur within the thinking
process (Peters). Sonnet 94, therefore, examines the consequences of inaction that result from unrealistic goals (Peters). In lines 1 through 8, Shakespeare confronts those who should act, i.e.