Research Paper on:
Six Argument Schemas

Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
remorse and beg forgiveness or inflict self-abuse. PREMISE 3: One does not have to feel guilty prior to committing an immoral act. CONCLUSION 1: Those without appropriate moral training and/or  exposure will not develop moral character imprint. CONCLUSION 2: Those who commit immoral or unethical acts contradict their moral life lessons. CONCLUSION 3: Guilt develops in a greater capacity after  the act has been committed. OVERALL CONCLUSION: Guilt is present no matter if the act is committed or merely considered. JARVIS THOMSON PREMISE 1: The villainous driver deserves  punishment for his aggressive behavior. PREMISE 2: Acts of self-defense upon the villainous driver are not justifiable if a life-threatening situation does not exist. PREMISE 3: Self-defense translates to saving  the lives of others. CONCLUSION 1: All villainous behavior deserves some extent of punishment. CONCLUSION 2: Villainous behavior, when not life-threatening, does not warrant excessive retaliation just because the person  is villainous. CONCLUSION 3: Self-defense must prove morally justifiable. OVERALL CONCLUSION: Every person has moral permission to defend his or her life to the greatest extent, even if that means  destroying property or another life, when the situation justifies doing so. FLETCHER PREMISE 1: The level of harm to ones being is in direct proportion to the defense mechanism  employed. PREMISE 2: Self-defense must correlate with reasonableness. PREMISE 3: Both law and morality must play a role in the extent to which. CONCLUSION 1: What is  deemed as life-threatening to one might be perceived as a challenge to another, establishing two very different impressions. CONCLUSION 2: Reasonableness is interpretive and not uniformly accepted. CONCLUSION  3: There is little leeway when it comes to misinterpreting legally and morally binding indicators. OVERALL CONCLUSION: An act might be justifiable under any number of stipulations but that does