These areas of management are discussed in depth and various corporations are included in the analysis. Implementing a strategic plan is discussed in this eight page paper that includes seven bibliographic entries.
Name of Research Paper File: D0_MTchastr.rtf
Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
of the reasons for this is because of not many people understand the concept behind change management, or its impact on a firm or its employees. The major aspect
to remember about change management is that is most effective when it follows a strategic plan, and win employees are prepared to deal with it and accept it.
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the concept of change management, define it and also explain issues that could occur in connection
with both strategic planning as it pertains to change management. Classical Approach - Advantages and Disadvantages Before determining if the classical approach
is the best way to manage both strategy and to help with change management issues, it might be a good idea to define exactly what the classical approach entails.
The classical view of strategy is considered one of the oldest views -- it was formulated during the early 1960s, when strategic management
was beginning to make its way into many business models (Harfield, 1998). Because arguably the classical approach was among the first, and because it came directly from the battlefields of
World War II, this approach is based on strict military tradition (Harfield, 1998; see also Whittington, 1993). In other words, the world is a very structured hierarchy, in which the
leader (either the CEO or general) makes the decision (Harfield, 1998). Once the decision is made, the subordinates are expected to obey those directives without question (Harfield, 1998). In other
words, the classical approach is a rather paternalistic one, in which one person -- or a group of individuals -- makes the major decisions and forces them down the chain