The validity of the Myers Briggs personality assessment test is compared and contrasted with the Strong Interest Survey in this paper, which discusses validity and gives examples.This paper has five pages and two sources are listed in the bibliography.
Name of Research Paper File: D0_MBpertest.rtf
Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
those tests most utilized, the Myers Briggs and the Strong Interest Inventory are the two most popular. Both have their strengths and weaknesses, so how does one determine which is
the type of test most likely to produce the needed information? SECTION ONE The Myers-Briggs test was developed in the 1940s and was based on the theories of Carl Jungs
theory of human personality traits. Four major areas are tested to determine the personality type of a person. They are: Extraversion (E) OR Introversion (I)
Sensing (S) OR Intuition (N) Thinking (T) OR Feeling (F)
Judging (J) OR Perceiving (P)(Myers 1998). Of course, there are many permutations which can occur as combinations of these traits. Myers Briggs does recognize that
there are many factors which go into influencing a particular persons behavior but believes that a majority of the personality type is revealed in the above patterns. The Myers
Briggs test is perhaps THE most widely used personality testing devices used by companies and institutions today. The Myers Briggs test is utilized by anyone interested in determining directions for
career development, self-understanding and development, career exploration, development and counseling, relationship and family counseling, organization development, team building, improving problem solving, management training, leadership development, education and curriculum development, diversity
and multicultural training(Myers 1998). According to some statistics, the Myers Briggs test is administered yearly to nearly three million individuals in the United States, alone. The way the Myers
Briggs test differs from other psychological tests in the way it is constructed, scored and interpreted. Jungs theories figure prominently and therefore factor into the interpretation of score results. However,