Research Paper on:
Substance Abuse and a Supervision Personal Theory

Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
Supervision in the therapeutic setting occurs in two directions, that between the therapist and the patient and that which occurs between the therapist and their supervisor. While  each has its specific connotations in regard to supervisory theory, there are numerous overlaps as well. Each of these supervisory functions has grounding in both supervisory theory and therapeutic  processes. Improved supervisory theory has the potential to effect positive change in regard to one of our most disturbing societal problems, the problem of substance abuse. One of  the most effective therapeutic options which can be coupled with supervisory theory in these cases is that of behavioral modification. Most programs which are designed to curb or eliminate  substance abuse have been essentially unsuccessful. These programs often have revolved around residential treatment programs, family counseling programs, and numerous other types of educational and outreach programs. Even  various pharmacological interventions such as methadone administration have failed to be effective. Behavioral modification interventions have, however, been more successful.  The literature reveals many pertinent points in regard to what it is that separates good supervision from poor supervision. Munson (2002) identifies five basic qualities of effective supervision:  1. Formal structure which is clear to both the supervisor and the supervisee.  This structure can include either individual supervision or group supervision or a combination of the two approaches.  2. Regularity of the supervision. 3. Consistency of the supervision