Research Paper on:
Against The Employee Free Choice Act

Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
phraseology problems in the Act. Taft-Hartley also established limitations on union activity that the NLRA had protected, such as secondary boycotts. arHartH HarlIf the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), were  to pass, it would be the first major change in collective bargaining since that time. Although the House cleared the Act in 2007, it failed to pass. A revised version  was introduced in 2009. This Act is one of controversy and the topic of heated debates with Democrats supporting the bill and Republicans opposing it. This essay opposes the Employee  Free Choice Act and explains why. Position on The Employee Free Choice Act Democrats believed they had enough votes to pass the (EFCA) in 2009. However, business leaders, chambers  of Commerce, and Republicans are fighting hard to prevent its passage. The fiercest opponent is the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. One of the factors Republicans and these groups are fighting  for are secret-ballot elections (M. Lee Smith Publishers, 2010). The NLRA guarantees employees the right to self-organize, the right to form or join a labor organization, the right to bargain  collectively through representatives of the union and the right to engage in other activities protected under the law (U.S. Department of Labor, 2012). Currently, unions are organized when organizers  talk with employees to see if they are interested. Then, unions have employees who are interested sign authorization cards that support the union. If 30 percent of employees sign the  cards, an election is held (Gross, 2009). The secret-ballot election is held to determine if a majority of the workers want to unionize. It requires a simple majority which is  50 percent plus one for union representation and the union that helped the workers becomes the exclusive bargaining representative (Gross, 2009). This becomes a bargaining unit within the union.