In ten pages this paper discusses that budgetary controls' costs of implementation are typically well worth it in terms of savings, but not in every instance. Ten sources are listed in the bibliography.
Name of Research Paper File: TS14_TEbudget.rtf
Buy This Research Paper »
Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
Where there is any system of control or monitoring is put into place there will be a plethora of associated costs. These will be both direct costs, such as the
costs of the systems involved, and indirect, such as the additional time taken up in preparing the figures and the supervision of the figures that are being monitored and the
opportunity cost of how that labour and effort may have been otherwise employed. The calculations that needs to take place with any scheme
of this type is whether or not the savings that will result will be greater than the costs incurred. If the answer is no then the scheme is not
worth implementing, unless it is adjusted so that the balance of the equation is changed. When we consider this in terms of
a budget it appear to be commonsense that a budget should be controlled, where it is not there is not only the risk of lost funds and over spends but
also the increased risk of misappropriation of funds and lax use of funds. If we are consider the subject in order to ascertain in controls may be seen as const
effective in controlling a budget we first need to proceed with consideration of what we mean by a budget. The
role of the budget is to control the costs and therefore the profits. It is also important in the short term for cash flow as there needs to be an
ability for a company to be able to pay their suppliers and creditors in the short term. Therefore, budgets can be seen as an important mechanism for controlling a company.
Back to Research Paper Results