Research Paper on:
Creon and Oedipus in Oedipus the King by Sophocles

Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
Creon. Respective to these central characters, each one comes to various conclusions with regard to the acceptance of reality, issues of heroism and morality and, perhaps above all, the  concept of their own mortality. Inasmuch as both characters derive their conclusions on account of individual occurrences, one can argue that the path to enlightenment may have been different,  but the ultimate outcome reaped the same benefit. With Oedipus as the protagonist and Creon as the antagonist, only Oedipus ends up the  tragic figure due directly to his inability to alter the course of his life. Defining this particular concept calls for ones close interpretation of what the roles of protagonist  and antagonist truly represent; with that, it becomes quite simple to understand how the lead characters can so easily slip into the tragic state they eventually inhabit. Through their  difficult and sometimes life-changing experiences, both Oedipus and Creon come to recognize what it is their own self-knowledge has gained through their individual struggles. When assessing the integral components  that comprise each character, it is important to determine just how much of their actions are motivated by fate or free will; summation of all applicable elements will likely lead  one to conclude that determinism plays a significantly essential role. Were Oedipus and Creons lives determined or were they the result of free  will? In establishing the answer to this question, it is essential that one understand the difference between the two representations. When one is cast forward by way of  determinism, it is as though one has absolutely no control over the various and sundry occurrences that take place during ones life. Free will, on the other hand, speaks