In five pages this paper examines the Middle East in a presentation of the argument that democracy does not benefit from neoliberalism. Three sources are cited in the bibliography.
Name of Research Paper File: D0_GSNeolib.rtf
Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
an ideology that theoretically blends liberal political views with an emphasis on economic growth. While this may be true and even admirable in theory, the reality is that neoliberalism
most often tends to benefit the rich while hurting the poor. Therefore, this system is not effectual for the overall society and should be abandoned as a model to
be emulated in this society. "Neoliberalism refers this refers to the set of national and international policies that call for business
domination of all social affairs with minimal countervailing force" (McChesney, 2002). Within the context of neoliberalism, there is almost always the belief that new technologies can solve "social
problems far better than any alternative course" (McChesney, 2002). Neoliberalism maintains that a representative democracy is part of the political structure but that it should be weak and basically
remain out of the affairs of the people - especially in terms of the poor and the working class (McChesney, 2002).
So then, as "lucrative as neoliberalism has been for the rich, it has been a disaster for the worlds poor and working classes" (McChesney, 2002). Essentially neoliberalism
has covered the globe in recent years as globalisation has increased throughout the world. Neoliberalism is the trend in the world today as globalisation becomes more and more of
a reality on a daily basis (Middle East Report: From the Editor, 2002). Many critics of neoliberalism believe that below the surface lies "the role of the U.S.
military as the global enforcer of capitalism, with U.S.-based corporations and investors in the drivers seat". In other words, this joining of neoliberal globalisation and U.S. militarism has some