Research Paper on:
Family Planning v. Sterilization in Peru

Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
representative of Peruvian history, imposing restrictions that allow only a limited number of children per family -- otherwise leaving the parents to face tubal ligation without their knowledge or consent  -- has been looked upon as barbarous for a twenty-first century nation. Issues of hostility toward women and the overwhelming statistical evidence of overpopulation concerns have turned what once  might have been a reasonably good idea into one that carries with it significant drawbacks with regard to the natural rights of human life. Is sterilization the answer to  Perus overpopulation problem, or can people be relied upon to carry out family planning? Clearly, the government does not trust its citizens to know when to cease procreation, which  is why the Peruvian Ministry of Healths Family Planning Program has taken it upon itself to enact an immediate solution; despite the outright implications, it appears to have made quite  a dent in the problem. "In 1997, state doctors performed 110,000 tubal ligations - up from 30,000 the year before. Among them were some atypical candidates: women with  no children, 15-to-19-year-olds, and menopausal women, according to various inquiries."1 II. FROM THE FAMILYS PERSPECTIVE Mr. and Mrs. Rey, a recently  married couple, had dreamt of a large family ever since they began planning their future together, but they were particularly desirous of a baby girl as the first addition.  When it came time to actually create that family, they knew that if they did no abide by the family planning mandates, they would find themselves in a great deal  of trouble; after all, Peru already had far too many people to support on the plot of land upon which the nation stood. They did not want to give