This 8 page paper provides an overview of the major points, methodology, thesis and purpose of Aleksandr Fursenko and Timothy Naftali’s book One Hell of a Gamble: Khrushchev, Castro and Kennedy, 1958-1964. While providing a comprehensive view of the book as a whole, this paper also considers the importance of the perspectives presented and the overall value of the book as a whole. No additional sources cited.
Name of Research Paper File: MH11_MHonehel.doc
Buy This Research Paper »
Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
book reshapes some of the common perceptions surrounding the Bay of Pigs incident through the evaluation of documents that have become available in the post-Cold War era. Though there
are some distinct issues that are not completely explained within the scope of this book, there is value to the perspectives provided and the new view of the Cuban conflict
from both sides. This book considers the major political issues and actions that occurred between 1958 and 1964, especially as they relate to the actions of President Kennedy and Russian
leader Nikita Krushchev. More specifically, the book focuses on the Cuban missile crisis and the events that lead up to the Bay of Pigs, but also reflects upon the
changes that have occurred in Russian-American relations since that time that have allowed for a more complete view on the actions of both leaders and their implications for relations with
Cubas Fidel Castro. The central method to this work is collaborative, and the two historians viewed the culmination of documentation from a variety of sources, including
the archives of a number of Eastern European countries and the documentation maintained by Russia regarding their action and their perspectives on the crises between both superpowers. While it
is evident that Fursenko played a major role in assessing some of the documents that became available following the opening of the documentation of Cold War Russia made available to
scholars of Western societies, this was just one segment of the process. In correlation, it was also necessary to view the perspectives on the American presidency, on the role
of Kennedy in order to shape the view presented. The evaluation of documents made available in the post-Cold War era, including a significant body of work provided by governmental
Back to Research Paper Results