Research Paper on:
Professions and Different Levels of Accountability

Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
one faces for their actions often varies according to the particulars of the situation. Society holds some individuals and professions to higher standards of legal accountability and responsibility than  we do other individuals and professions. This variance is justified by the potential impact an action can have. When a reporter makes a mistake in a magazine article, for  example, you can run a correction but when a health care worker makes a mistake someones life might hang in the balance. Differing levels of accountability are thus justified  by the particulars of a situation. The medical arena is one of three time-honored professions. These are theology, law, and  medicine. These professions in particular are often held to a higher set of standards than other professions as a reflection of the weight of their responsibilities. Journalism too,  however, has its own set of professional codes and ethics. Because life or soul does not typically hang in the balance of journalistic error, however, seldom is this profession  held to the same standards of accountability as are the three noted above. The key element determining higher accountability, therefore appears to be human life. There are, of  course various other elements which enter into accountability concerns but human life is the most concerning. The contention outlined above can be illustrated  time and time again outside both journalism and the medical profession. There are indeed a number of connotations of the observations made above. Differing levels of accountability apply  both to individuals and to corporate entities, for example. A corporation is a legal entity with its own name and identity. The rights, privileges and liabilities enjoyed by