Research Paper on:
'Without Prejudice' Correspondence Admissibility

Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
far as possible to settle their disputes without resort to litigation and should not be discouraged by the knowledge that anything that is said in the course of such negotiations  may be used to their prejudice in the course of the proceedings" (Oliver, 306, 1984). THE ADMISSABILITY OF EVIDENCE The type, duration  and resolution of conflict, as well as supervisor involvement, are all applicable to the method by which mediation neutrality addresses the issues of personal discord. By utilizing such operational  definitions as interviews, questionnaires and control groups from a variety of socioeconomic, cultural and age/gender backgrounds, these findings are indicative of a slow but steady movement toward more readily accessible  and advantageous conflict resolution. "...Solidarity provides the basis for extraordinary organizational cooperation and teamwork" (Harrison, 1998, p. harrison.html). For the most part, all people experience difficulties at some  point in their key relationships whether it be through doing business with other parties or with associates. When mediators and other legal  officials experience difficulty in their challenging roles, it is critically important that they know how to diagnose the problems in order to identify appropriate solutions and avoid costly mistakes (Steckler,  1995, p. 20). In the case of Rush & Tompkins v. Greater London Council, "One issue in this appeal concerns the production to  the court of without prejudice letters to show that a consent order had been agreed. Mr. Mundashi has argued that, as a general rule, such correspondence ought not to be  admitted in evidence" (Rush & Tompkins 1989). While this model paper will help the student write his or her own assignment by giving