In twelve pages EU competition regulation and legislation are discussed in terms of approach suitability in a consideration of case law and an evaluation of their advantages and disadvantages. Eleven sources are listed in the bibliography.
Name of Research Paper File: TS14_TEcentrl.rtf
Unformatted Sample Text from the Research Paper:
greater degree under direct Community control, and... hands on Community authority has been delegated by the Council to the Commission" (Lane, 2000; 46). When we consider
the way in which the European Union is administered and the ideas of both subsidiarity and proportionality, it is apparent that for most sectors of ERU law it is necessary
that the nation state be able to administer the laws as is fitting with their own legal instruments and cultural applications. As long as the end result is in line
with the EU regulations, then the method of implementation is down to the nation states. There are also many issues, especially when it comes to business law and the way
it is regulated, that are appropriate to be considered locally. However, when it comes to competition issues we may start to argue that this is a wider issue, and as
such there is a need for a higher level of community involvement, otherwise the same competition may be regulated in different ways with different margins and standards in each country.
In this we also need to remember that although one of the main purposes there was a desire to create peace, this was achieved through the creation of a trading
zone, where the barrier to trade were to be reduced and then eliminated. If differing countries have different standards or systems then these may be seen as barriers, however, we
also need to consider the role of the commission that undertakes the reviews of the competition law. Here we may argue that
as a result of its standing, not only has it been a source of law but we may argue that in its role it may also be seen to try